Recently I was responding to some comments in Facebook where a guy was all about live-in relationships. I don't know why he is so facinated by the concept of live-in, maybe it makes him feel "ultra-modern". As you can already guess, I am not a big fan of living in relationships. They simply don't make any sense to me. People arguing in favor have only one point to state - "if you are already committed to someone, why would you need to have a legal bond?" In a famous Bengali story by Saradindu, "Bidrohi" (The Rebel), Debabrata, the protagonist says, "When there is love, marriage is unnecessary. And where it isn't, marriage is an inhuman exploitation". But that very rebel later when he was mature said "if not anything marriage has a value in society". Here are the points, why.
1. People who are lucky enough to experience true love in their lives know that it's human nature to express that love. You want to tell the world that you are in love. "I want the world to know that you're in love with me" is the way people feel. Wedding, even if that's a simple affair, gives the opportunity to show that publicly.
2. Legal marriage has a social value. If we didn't have this binding, anyone can go live with anyone else. Then they'll have a bunch of kids who will grow up without proper identity. Humans need the concept of a family to grow up. They need a father figure and a maternal caregiver, which is not possible in broken homes.
3. Unlike marriage, live-ins don't have a legal age. So, technically a teenager can decide to live-in with her boyfriend. Which is disastrous.
4. I don't know where to start from if I want to talk about kids of live-in families. They are given up for adoption, abandoned or brought up with a whole bunch of half siblings. Most of the time the parents are immature, young and don't have decent jobs to support them. All these lead to terrible parenting and bringing up of a generation on weak morals.
5. Also, if some people claim that they have a strong enough commitment that doens't require a legal binding, I ask them, if they are so confident in their relationship why are they scared to give their relationship a legal name?
6. If a couple gets divorced, the parents still have the responsibility of bringing up the kids. If they shun that, there is the Court. This is not possible in live-ins. Fights for custody can take ugly turns too. Most of the time single teen moms are left to fend for themselves and their babies.
7. In the pre-historic days people didn't have the concept of marriage, but then they decided that a formal bonding is necessary to thrive in the society. It is not for nothing that ALL religions, cultures and societies all over the world, so different in all other aspects are unanimous in this respect. They all rever the "holy wedlock". A married couple is looked up to. They are wished happiness and blessed by all. From the Sanskrit mantras saying that marriages last for more than one birth, and the famous Corinthians verse 1:13 of "Love is patient, Love is kind" to the general saying of "Marriages are made in Heaven" we see that marriage is still honored as the culmination of love.
9. On top of that, as marriage is a legal bond, you'll need to pay less income tax if you are married. Your life insurance would automatically go to your spouse if you are a WA resident. These are practical points not to be neglected :-)
10. Another point some live-in people said is, they want to stay and test if the person is right for them before they get married. How many people will they live with to test their "trial and error" process?
11. Why are same-sex couples fighting for legalizing their relationships? Just because they know that having a legal commitment is necessary to live in society.
I can only think of one reason in favor of a live-in is that when you already know you are going to marry this person and you are engaged, then instead of renting two different apartments, you can live together. Or, if you are waiting for your wedding after getting the marriage license!!
In my opinion, people who are not confident in their decisions and who want an easy way out from their responsibilities would want to live in. In that way they can gain the advantage of having a relationship but not the responsibility that comes with it.
There's nothing facinating in live-ins. So think about the pros and cons of marriage versus live-ins before you start to show yourself off as a so called "free thinker". Marriage has stood the test of time and I do believe it'll keep on binding the socitey as it has done always.